Critically analyse the fall of mankind in Genesis 3 and God's response Essay

Critically analyse the fall of mankind in Genesis 3 and deitys response to it - Essay ExampleExegesis of Genesis 3 1-24 This book begins with the temptation of mankind via demon slandering God to Eve through angelic disguise. The snake was a creature created by God, but it was a stoolie creature as compared to the other animals created. Satan chooses to use the serpent as it had a crafty reference work (genesis 31). The baffle in dwelt the snake and it is his tone of voice that was heard by Eve. The serpent began a conversation with Eve in relation to Gods prohibition to the tree in the total of the Garden of Eden (Westbow Press 2013 127). The expression used by the serpent to Eve was very precise it was a rhetorical psyche. The woman replied by saying that they were allowed all other fruits except the one in the middle of the garden. The serpent brushes this aside to concentrate in on Gods ruling bugger off in of the tree of understanding of good and wickedness (Kvam 1999 e t al 431). This term, or you will die is used common chord times in verses 3 and 4. It is unclear what Eve comprehended concerning the expiry for none of the animals created had passed away. This term may have been communicated by God to the man and woman (Williams 2010 17). According to the Bible, there are three types of demise the spiritual death which transpires in Genesis 3, the physical death which conclusions (Genesis 5), and the eternal death as an outcome of mans bolshie, defiant heart (Revelation 211). Genesis 3 4-5 reveals how Satan assaulted Gods authenticity as well as the genuineness of Gods word this was evident from Satans denial of Gods statement. There was limited truth in the words expressed by Satan, consumption of the fruit could not make man reason or be exchangeable God. The offer given to Eve was too intoxicating. Eve was tempted in three stages first she cut that the tree was good for food, second that it was pleasant to the eye, and thirdly that it w as desirable to make one wise. This reveals the threefold ontogeny of temptation to the actual act of sin. Eve later on acted towards Adam in the same dash that the serpent acted towards her. According to the book written by Milton, Paradise Lost, Adam ate the fruit so that he would not be separated from Eve (Milton & Stallard 2011 38). Immediately after the consumption, they knew they were naked and sewed leaves together to cover their nakedness (Genesis 37). The opening of their eyes was not a substantial opening of the eyes but the realization of their nakedness and loss of the glory they had enjoyed. In the conversation that proceeds, God does not come to Adam to rebuke him or exile him from Paradise, but to bring him to his senses. God asked a rhetorical move Where are you so that Adam and Eve could realize what they had done. According to Clark Pennock, (2002) The Most Moved Mover, this rhetorical question is used to develop an aspect in Gods character known as plain-spok en Theism. Adam did not answer with remorse, but with self-justification, thereby bringing punishment upon himself. Adam blamed the woman, and nevertheless God Himself forgetting that he was responsible for his own actions. This is in line with Flip Wilsons theology The Devil made me do it is no more of a justification than Cultural atmosphere forced me to do it or Genetic factors prompted me to do it,